Car modifications

Car Modifications Talks Archive

A-E | E-M | M-S | S-Z

1st page | 2nd page | 3rd page | 4th page | 5th page | 6th page | 7th page | 8th page | 9th page | 10th page | 11th page | 12th page





Subject:
Re: Fiat Sceicento Sporting

From: "JackH" <jackhackettuk(at)yahoo.co.uk>

Subject: Re: Fiat Sceicento Sporting

Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:01:45 +0100

Lines: 16

_______________________________________











SteveH wrote:

> DervMan <dervman(at)ntlworld.com> wrote:



>> Anyway, is the Cinquecento featured in Gran Turismo 4? Oh, look, no

>> it`s not. But the pushrod 1.3 Ka is...

>

> As if that`s a measure.



Well even if it was, I`ve got a Panda 1000s, and a Volvo 240 estate in my

GT4 fleet, never mind other assorted old shite I can`t be bothered to reel

off...



--

JackH













Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: Fiat Sceicento Sporting
GO >>>

From: "Pete M" <pete.murray(at)blue-nopressedmeat-yonder.co.uk>

Subject: Re: Fiat Sceicento Sporting

Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:01:56 +0100

Lines: 36

NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.42.122.178

_______________________________________











In news:1gy7o10.11o8a9a1tvcluxN%steve(at)italiancar.co.uk,

SteveH <steve(at)italiancar.co.uk> decided to enlighten our sheltered souls

with a rant as follows

> DervMan <dervman(at)ntlworld.com> wrote:

>

>>> *ding*

>>>

>>> The Fiat solution for PAS was much better (once it arrived on the

>>> Sei) - they used electric assistance rather than using a

>>> power-sapping hydraulic pump they grabbed from the parts bin.

>>

>>

>> And robbed it of feel...

>>

>> Have you tried the Ka`s PAS?

>

> Don`t see the point in PAS on a Ka unless you`re a frail old granny.

> All it does is rob you of bhp.



Much, *much* quicker rack in the PAS Ka.



It`s like owning a narrowbody 155 and thinking it`s as good as a widebody

one, saying Ka`s without power are crap.





--

Pete M

"If it does more than 20 mpg in town, I don`t want it"

Range Rover Vogue SE,

Porsche 911 Carrera 3.2

Ford Capri (ressurection started)



COSOC #5

Scouse Git extraordinaire. Liverpool, Great Britain










Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: Fiat Sceicento Sporting
GO >>>

From: "Pete M" <pete.murray(at)blue-nopressedmeat-yonder.co.uk>

Subject: Re: Fiat Sceicento Sporting

Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:04:20 +0100

Lines: 55

NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.42.122.178

_______________________________________











In news:1gy7ok4.17zuog1qkxxmlN%steve(at)italiancar.co.uk,

SteveH <steve(at)italiancar.co.uk> decided to enlighten our sheltered souls

with a rant as follows

> DervMan <dervman(at)ntlworld.com> wrote:

>

>> "SteveH" <steve(at)italiancar.co.uk> wrote in message

>> news:1gy643y.bpjgsou5ljo5N%steve(at)italiancar.co.uk...

>>> DervMan <dervman(at)ntlworld.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Ford raised the city car game by devising a chassis that slapped

>>>> everything

>>>> else in the class about the face with a wed haddock in the twisty

>>>> material

>>>> but also gave it a supple ride and decent motorway refinement.

>>>

>>> Then lumbered it with a wheezy old pushrod engine and Fisher Price

>>> styling.

>>

>> Who cares about the design of the engine? More people don`t than

>> do...

>

> So? - is that some feeble excuse for Ford continuing with an engine

> that should have been replaced 20 years ago?



It`s only the same as as the Lampredi lump, except the Ka one passes

emissions regs.



>

>> The styling is cute, but it`s also personal. You`re not going to

>> like it because (a) it`s trendy to dislike it and (b) it wears a

>> Ford badge.

>>

>> I`m open minded about such things.

>

> It`s not cute. It`s too curvy and has a fat arse.



Heh, it`s a four wheeled Baby Spice.



>

> Just like you like your women.



Lol





--

Pete M

"If it does more than 20 mpg in town, I don`t want it"

Range Rover Vogue SE,

Porsche 911 Carrera 3.2

Ford Capri (ressurection started)



COSOC #5

Scouse Git extraordinaire. Liverpool, Great Britain














Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:


Title: 9/25/2009 --it hits the fan
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:07:41 +0000
Author: seamorg

Today the world buzzes with reports of a secret nuclear site somehow unearthed in Iran (I haven’t heard how exactly this unfolded quite yet), and the dilemma: how to “punish” a country that is already knee deep in sanctions?  An NPR piece summarized the following problem: even with the current multilateral sanctions on Iran, Iran’s GDP is estimated to grow 2% next year.  Trade with Iran continues through Dubai.  Clarification: just because the GDP grows, don’t mean the average man sees it.  Average Iranians have lived with high unemployment, low income for years; the source was unclear whether this is thought to be an effect of the sanctions or of mismanagement [will post NPR link soon]. 

A few things to think about:

1.  It is wrong to talk flippantly about how to punish a country.  Iranians screamed out to the world that they are not their leaders and are prepared to die to change the actions of these leaders.  We need to figure out how to punish/regulate the leaders, in partnership with the people.

2.  There have never been complete sanctions on Iran and there probably will never be. 

The unrecognized elephant in the room is that, if we were really to punish Iran and specifically Iranian leaders, we would stop them from selling oil.  In order to do that, of course:

the rest of the world needs to stop using so much oil.

How silly of course.  It’s easier to prohibit an entire nation (74million) of people from buying and selling the things they need for survival, such as: antibiotics, scholastic jourals, airplane parts, food, and even to consider military intervention, than to organize sanctions that would affect Iran’s leaders.  A freeze on Iran’s oil would be harsh; but why not free up access to basic goods and freeze up the sale of oil.  You’d see how quickly things change.


More on: http://iranelectionstories.org/2009/09/26/9252009-it-hits-the-fan/



____________________________________________________________

Title: A BMW inspired by Usain Bolt's trainers?
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:20:10 +0000
Author: dhenztm

Well, maybe.  Presenting the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics: a car that’s at par with Toyota Prius 2010 in terms of emission, lowest drag coefficient of any BMW car at 0.22, and killer looks that looks a bit like a trainer:

Doesnt it look like a trainer shoe?

Doesn't it look like a trainer shoe?

I know it has nothing to do with running but won’t you agree that this cool car is such an eye-candy?

Photos courtesy http://green.autoblog.com/gallery/bmw-vision-efficientdynamics-concept/.


More on: http://runningpinoy.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/a-bmw-inspired-by-usain-bolts-trainers/













Powered by x701.com